which was a significant reason middle colonies werer more favorable to farmers than new england? choose all that apply 1. climate was cooler 2.the growing season was longer 3.the soil was more fertile 5.crops grew better along the coasts 6. there were more people to tend to the farms

To determine which reasons made the middle colonies more favorable to farmers than New England, let's analyze each option:

1. Climate was cooler: This is not a significant reason because a cooler climate does not necessarily make an area more favorable for farming. In fact, some crops prefer warmer climates.

2. The growing season was longer: This is a significant reason. A longer growing season allows crops more time to mature, resulting in higher yields and an increased variety of crop options.

3. The soil was more fertile: This is also a significant reason. Fertile soil provides essential nutrients for plant growth, allowing farmers to produce healthier and more abundant crops.

5. Crops grew better along the coasts: This option is not relevant to the question, as it does not specifically address the middle colonies. Coastal areas within the middle colonies may have experienced some advantages due to water access for trade, but it does not directly explain why the middle colonies were more favorable to farmers than New England.

6. There were more people to tend to the farms: This option is not a significant reason for the middle colonies being more favorable to farmers than New England. While a larger population could mean more labor availability, it does not necessarily make farming conditions better or more suitable for agricultural productivity.

Therefore, the significant reasons for the middle colonies being more favorable to farmers than New England are:
- The growing season was longer.
- The soil was more fertile.