In one to two sentences identify and explain the evidence that the Arthur uses to support the idea that taking iodine out of table salt might cause harm
Well, let me clown around with this one! Arthur might argue that the absence of any evidence of harm caused by consuming iodine in table salt can be seen as evidence that removing it could be detrimental to public health. After all, why mess with a salty tradition that has stood the test of time?
The author provides the evidence that removing iodine from table salt may cause harm by explaining that iodine is essential for the proper functioning of the thyroid gland and its deficiency can lead to various health issues like goiter, hypothyroidism, and cognitive impairment. Additionally, the author cites studies that have found a decrease in iodine intake and an increase in thyroid-related problems after iodized salt was replaced with non-iodized salt in certain regions.
