What is a reason that the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects?

1.It only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase
2.It only applied to the lands of the Mexican Cession
3.It relied on popular sovereignty
4.It limited the number of states that could be admitted per year

Answers?

The reason that the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is because it only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase. This means that it did not address the issue of slavery in other regions, such as the lands acquired through the Mexican Cession.

To determine this answer, you can start by understanding what the Missouri Compromise was. The Missouri Compromise was a legislative agreement passed by the U.S. Congress in 1820. It aimed to address the issue of slavery in the newly acquired western territories of the United States, particularly the area of the Louisiana Purchase.

Next, consider the options provided:
1. It only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase - This option is correct. The Missouri Compromise specifically dealt with the issue of slavery in the lands acquired through the Louisiana Purchase. It did not address the issue of slavery in other regions, such as the lands obtained through the Mexican Cession.

2. It only applied to the lands of the Mexican Cession - This option is incorrect. The Missouri Compromise did not apply to the lands acquired through the Mexican Cession.

3. It relied on popular sovereignty - This option is incorrect. The Missouri Compromise did not rely on popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty refers to the concept of allowing the residents of a territory or state to decide whether or not to permit slavery within its borders. The Missouri Compromise, on the other hand, imposed a fixed boundary line (the 36°30’ parallel) that prohibited slavery in territories north of that line and allowed it south of that line.

4. It limited the number of states that could be admitted per year - This option is incorrect. The Missouri Compromise did not limit the number of states that could be admitted per year. It focused on the issue of slavery in the western territories and sought to maintain a balance between slave and free states.

In conclusion, the correct reason why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is that it only applied to the lands of the Louisiana Purchase, and did not address slavery in other regions such as the lands acquired through the Mexican Cession.

The reason that the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is that it only applied to the lands of the Missouri Territory and the lands acquired in the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, addressing the issue of slavery in those specific territories. It did not address or apply to the lands from the later Mexican Cession in 1848. Therefore, option 1 is the correct reason. Options 2, 3, and 4 are incorrect as they do not accurately explain why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects.