The two main source of opposition to the reforms of emperor tewdros were?

www.jiskha.com/questions/1326500/the-two-main-internal-challenges-to-the-policy-of-emperor-tewdros-ii-came-from-and

The two main sources of opposition to the reforms of Emperor Tewodros were:

1. Nobility and Feudal Lords: The traditional nobility and feudal lords were resistant to Tewodros' reforms as they threatened their traditional privileges, power, and control over their domains. Tewodros aimed to centralize power and reduce their influence, which led to their opposition to his reforms.

2. Church Officials: The Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which held significant influence and power in Ethiopian society, also opposed Tewodros' reforms. Tewodros sought to establish a closer relationship between the church and the state, thereby limiting the church's autonomy and financial independence. As a result, church leaders resisted his reforms and viewed them as a threat to their authority and influence.

To find the answer to your question, you can begin by researching the historical period and Emperor Tewodros II. Emperor Tewodros II was an Ethiopian ruler who implemented various reforms during his reign in the 19th century. The two main sources of opposition to his reforms can be uncovered through historical accounts, scholarly books, or articles on Emperor Tewodros II.

1. Local Rulers and Nobility: One source of opposition to Emperor Tewodros' reforms came from regional rulers and local nobility. As Tewodros aimed to centralize power and establish a strong central government, his reforms threatened the authority and autonomy of these regional rulers and aristocrats who were accustomed to maintaining significant power and control within their own domains.

2. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church: The Ethiopian Orthodox Church was another significant opposition to Emperor Tewodros' reforms. Although Tewodros was a devout Christian, his reforms conflicted with the established authority and traditional practices of the church. His attempts to exert control over the church and interfere in ecclesiastical matters faced strong resistance from religious leaders who viewed this as a threat to the religious institution's autonomy.

Remember, historical research is an excellent way to gain a deeper understanding of this topic. It is always recommended to consult diverse sources to get a comprehensive view and form a well-rounded analysis.