1. In the Supreme Court case United States v. Windsor, the court decided that the Defense of M/a//rria//ge Act violated which of the following?
a. the comity clause
b. the due process cause of the fifth amendment
c. states rights
d. reasonable discrimination
can someone help lol
1.b. the 5th amendmant
2.c. full faith and credit
3. b. charging more money for oos college
THX DUDE!!!
Jovian Contreras is correct 100%
Jovian Contreras is correct i got a 100%
Certainly! I'd be happy to help you with that question.
To find the answer, we need to understand the key aspects of the case United States v. Windsor and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
1. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was a federal law enacted in 1996 that defined marriage as between one man and one woman for the purpose of federal laws. It denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages and allowed states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.
2. In United States v. Windsor, Edith Windsor, a same-sex widow, challenged Section 3 of DOMA, which defined marriage for federal purposes. Windsor argued that DOMA violated the Fifth Amendment's equal protection and due process clauses by discriminating against same-sex marriages.
Now, let's analyze the options given:
a. The comity clause: The comity clause refers to the principle of mutual respect and cooperation among states. While states' cooperation is relevant to the case, it is not directly violated by DOMA.
b. The due process clause of the Fifth Amendment: As mentioned earlier, Edith Windsor argued that DOMA violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. So, this option is correct.
c. States' rights: Although the issue of state's rights can be considered in cases involving federal and state interaction, United States v. Windsor primarily revolved around the constitutional rights of individuals, specifically the equal protection and due process rights.
d. Reasonable discrimination: Discrimination is a central concept in this case, but the Supreme Court ruled that the discrimination imposed by DOMA was not reasonable. Therefore, this option is not correct.
Based on the analysis, the correct answer is b. the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Windsor that Section 3 of DOMA violated the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fifth Amendment.