How would Samuel A Worcester most likely view in the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people
To determine how Samuel A. Worcester, a prominent figure in the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people, would most likely view the end result, we need to understand his perspective and the context of the situation. Samuel A. Worcester was a missionary who lived among the Cherokee and was actively involved in advocating for their rights.
First, it's important to note that the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people revolved around the question of the Cherokees' sovereignty and land rights. The state of Georgia sought to extend its jurisdiction over Cherokee lands, while the Cherokee, supported by Worcester and others, sought to protect their autonomy and land ownership.
Worcester firmly believed in the rights of the Cherokee people. He understood that the Cherokee Nation was a sovereign entity with their own laws and governance, which had been recognized in treaties with the U.S. government. He also recognized the importance of land rights for the Cherokee's cultural preservation and overall well-being.
In 1832, Worcester was arrested and charged under Georgia law for living on Cherokee land without a state-issued license. This arrest led to an important legal case, Worcester v. Georgia, which eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court's decision in 1832 was seen as a victory for the Cherokee people. The ruling declared that Georgia's laws did not have jurisdiction over Cherokee lands and affirmed the Cherokees' rights as a sovereign nation. However, President Andrew Jackson, who wanted to remove Native American tribes from their lands, famously defied the Supreme Court's decision and continued with his policy of Indian removal.
Given Worcester's commitment to the Cherokee cause and his efforts to protect their rights and autonomy, it is likely that he would have viewed the end result of the legal battle with disappointment and frustration. Despite the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of the Cherokee, the federal government's failure to enforce the decision and the subsequent forced removal of the Cherokee on the Trail of Tears would have been deeply disheartening for Worcester and those who shared his views.
To summarize, Samuel A. Worcester would most likely view the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people as a setback and a failure to uphold the rights of the Cherokee Nation, due to the lack of enforcement of the Supreme Court's ruling and the tragic consequences that followed.