Which is a narrow, debatable claim

what are the choices?

I need help

A narrow, debatable claim is a statement that is specific and focused, and can be subject to differing opinions or arguments. Here are a few examples:

1. "The death penalty is an ineffective method of reducing crime rates."
To evaluate the narrowness of this claim, one would need to consider whether it specifies any particular jurisdiction or time frame. If the claim was modified to, for example, "The death penalty is an ineffective method of reducing crime rates in the United States within the past decade," it would be even narrower and more debatable.

2. "Universal healthcare leads to a decline in the quality of healthcare services."
Again, the specificity of this claim can be evaluated by considering any additional details provided. For instance, specifying a particular country or comparing universal healthcare systems across different nations would make the claim even narrower and more open to debate.

3. "Carbon emissions regulations are detrimental to the economy."
As with the previous examples, adding further details, such as focusing on a particular industry or examining the long-term economic effects, would narrow down this claim and make it more debatable.

In general, a narrow, debatable claim provides a clear focus and allows for varying perspectives or arguments to be presented. It is important to note that the level of specificity and debatability can vary depending on the context and intended audience.