What step will be most effective for a manufacturer that wants to reduce the human costs of extracting the minerals it uses in its smartphones?(1 point)
verifying that child labor was not used in mining these minerals
decreasing the prices of its products
switching to using gold instead of tungsten in its products
committing to only mining minerals in the United States
Verifying that child labor was not used in mining these materials
The most effective step for a manufacturer that wants to reduce the human costs of extracting minerals used in smartphones would be to verify that child labor was not used in mining these minerals.
The most effective step for a manufacturer that wants to reduce the human costs of extracting minerals in its smartphones would be to verify that child labor was not used in mining these minerals.
To get this answer, you need to evaluate the options presented and consider the ethical implications.
- Decreasing the prices of its products may provide some benefits to consumers, but it does not directly address the issue of human costs in mineral extraction.
- Switching to using gold instead of tungsten may have different environmental and social impacts but does not necessarily address the issue of human costs in mineral extraction.
- Committing to only mining minerals in the United States is a possibility, but it does not guarantee the elimination of human rights abuses in mining operations.
Therefore, the best option for reducing the human costs of mineral extraction is to ensure that child labor was not used in mining these minerals. This can be achieved by implementing responsible sourcing practices, conducting regular audits and inspections of supply chain partners, and supporting initiatives that promote ethical mining standards.