Which correctly detail the arguments on both sides of the global warming debate?
Select all that apply.
Supporters accuse critics of using false claims to gain control. Critics accuse supporters of protecting big business.
Supporters demand immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions. Critics claim that it would hamper economic growth.
Supporters say humans need to correct the problem soon. Critics maintain that the earth is simply experiencing a natural cycle.
Supporters believe the burning of rain forests raises temperatures. Critics claim the farmland is more valuable.
I would say the middle two choices.
The arguments on both sides of the global warming debate can be summarized as follows:
1. Supporters accuse critics of using false claims to gain control.
- This argument suggests that critics of global warming use misleading or incorrect information to manipulate the narrative of the issue and gain control over relevant policies or resources.
2. Critics accuse supporters of protecting big business.
- This argument states that supporters of global warming are motivated by personal interests or economic benefits, particularly in protecting large corporations or industries that may be negatively impacted by environmental regulations.
3. Supporters demand immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions.
- This argument emphasizes the importance of taking immediate and decisive action to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, as these emissions are considered a significant cause of global warming and climate change.
4. Critics claim that immediate action would hamper economic growth.
- This argument asserts that implementing strict measures to decrease CO2 emissions would have negative consequences on economic growth, such as increased costs or restrictions on industries.
5. Supporters say humans need to correct the problem soon.
- This argument stresses the urgency of human intervention to address global warming, as it is perceived as a significant threat to the planet and future generations.
6. Critics maintain that the Earth is simply experiencing a natural cycle.
- This argument suggests that the observed changes in climate are part of natural fluctuations and cycles, and human activities are not primarily responsible for global warming.
7. Supporters believe the burning of rainforests raises temperatures.
- This argument highlights the belief that the practice of burning rainforests contributes to the increase in global temperatures, potentially exacerbating the effects of global warming.
8. Critics claim that farmland is more valuable.
- This argument suggests that the preservation or use of land for agricultural purposes is more valuable and should be prioritized over environmental concerns related to global warming.
Therefore, the correct statements that detail the arguments on both sides of the global warming debate are:
- Supporters demand immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions. Critics claim that it would hamper economic growth.
- Supporters say humans need to correct the problem soon. Critics maintain that the Earth is simply experiencing a natural cycle.
- Supporters believe the burning of rainforests raises temperatures. Critics claim that farmland is more valuable.