How was Mesotopamians power given down.

How was Indus Valley government power given down

These questions make no sense. Please revise so they are understandable.

To understand how power was passed down in Mesopotamia, it is important to note that different Mesopotamian city-states and empires had varying structures of governance throughout its history. However, a common pattern can be observed across many different Mesopotamian civilizations.

1. Monarchy: In early Mesopotamian city-states like Sumer, power was often concentrated in the hands of a monarch, who ruled as a king or queen. These rulers claimed their authority through divine right, asserting their connection to the gods and goddesses of Mesopotamian mythology.

2. Succession: The process of passing down power in Mesopotamian monarchies usually followed a system of hereditary succession, where a ruler's offspring or close relatives would inherit the throne upon their death. This was commonly referred to as a dynastic succession.

3. Co-regency: In some cases, power could be shared through a co-regency, where a monarch would rule alongside their designated heir for a period of time. This allowed for a smoother transition of power and ensured stability during the transition.

4. Dynastic Shifts: Throughout Mesopotamian history, different dynasties and ruling families rose and fell, often as a result of conquest or internal power struggles. When a ruling dynasty was overthrown, a new family would come into power, leading to a shift in political authority.

5. Deposition and Rebellion: Succession was not always peaceful, and rulers could be deposed through rebellion or coup d'état. These power struggles within the ruling class or conflicts with external forces could lead to the overthrow of a current monarch and the rise of a new one.

It is important to note that there were variations in these systems across different time periods and regions within Mesopotamia. Additionally, as with any complex society, power dynamics could have been influenced by factors such as alliances, military strength, religious legitimacy, and the support of influential individuals or groups.