Develop a logical argument for imperialism in the United States during the 20th Century: Why might it have been something the United States wanted to try? What arguments were our leaders making to let us claim outside territory? PLS HELP ME
The only logical argument is that imperialism allows the country to import valuable resources without paying for them.
You're welcome, o.
Thank you, Ms. Sue, I will put it into my own words!
In order to develop a logical argument for imperialism in the United States during the 20th century, it's important to understand the historical context and the perspectives of that time period. While taking into account that viewpoints on imperialism have evolved over time, let's explore some arguments that were made by US leaders to justify this pursuit:
1. Economic opportunities: One of the primary motivations for US imperialism was the desire to expand markets and access new resources. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there was a growing belief in the concept of Manifest Destiny, which held that the United States was destined to expand its influence and economic power. By acquiring colonies and territories, the US aimed to secure raw materials, establish new markets for American goods, and ensure a steady supply of cheap labor.
2. Security and military strategy: Some US leaders argued that acquiring overseas territories would enhance national security and military capabilities. They believed that by establishing naval bases and coaling stations in strategic locations, such as the Philippines or Guam, the US would be better positioned to protect its interests and project power globally. Additionally, the acquisition of these territories was framed as a way to prevent rival powers, like Germany and Japan, from gaining a foothold in key regions.
3. Cultural superiority and mission to civilize: Another argument put forth by US leaders was that imperialism could enable the spread of American values and civilization to other nations. This perspective, often associated with the concept of American exceptionalism, suggested that the United States had a duty to help "less civilized" nations by introducing democratic ideals, promoting economic development, and providing education and infrastructure.
4. Response to global competition: Many US leaders feared that if they did not engage in imperialism, the country would be left behind in the global race for colonies and influence. European powers had already established vast colonial empires, and the United States sought to maintain its status as a major player on the international stage.
It is important to recognize that these arguments were contested and debated during the time, with critics raising concerns about exploitation, violation of sovereignty, and inconsistency with democratic principles. Historical analysis of US imperialism also highlights the impacts and legacies, including both positive and negative consequences, that continue to shape the nation's history.
To explore these arguments further, you can refer to primary sources such as speeches, writings, and policy documents from US leaders during the 20th century. Additionally, historical texts, academic articles, and scholarly research can provide valuable insights into the motivations and justifications behind US imperialism.