Question

Which of the following correctly analyzes the difference in the Supreme Court’s reasoning in McConnell v. FEC and Citizens United v. FEC concerning whether limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason for the federal government to limit independent expenditure?(1 point) Responses In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure. In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure. In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure. In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure. In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason for the government to limit independent expenditure. In both cases the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason for the government to limit independent expenditure. In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure; in Citizens United v. FEC the Supre

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

me Court ruled that it was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.

Answer 2

whats an option from above that is correct

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.

Answer 4

are you sure

Answer 5

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

I apologize for the confusion. Let me clarify.

The correct option from the list provided is:

In McConnell v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that limiting the perception of corruption was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure, while in Citizens United v. FEC the Supreme Court ruled that it was not a legitimate reason to limit independent expenditure.