Question

HII Use the claim and evidence to complete the activity.

Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on Election Day.

Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail.

In 1–2 sentences, evaluate the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above to determine if the claim is or is not convincing.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The evidence provided is relevant as it highlights alternative voting options for individuals unable to vote on Election Day. However, the evidence is not sufficient as it only mentions early voting and mail-in ballots, leaving out other potential voting methods such as absentee ballots or polling place accessibility. Overall, the evidence partially supports the claim but could be strengthened by including additional voting options.

Answer 2

2 senteces

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The evidence provided is relevant as it addresses alternative voting methods for those unable to vote on Election Day, such as early voting and mail-in ballots. While these options are important to consider, the claim could be more convincing with the inclusion of a wider range of voting alternatives.

Answer 4

shorten

Answer 5

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The evidence of early voting and mail-in ballots supports the claim that people have multiple voting options if unable to vote on Election Day, but the argument could be bolstered by mentioning additional voting methods.