Question

What change, if any, best retains the meaning of the original sentence and avoids contested usage involving coordinating conjunctions?

If he wanted to move, then she was not averse to considering it. But the home had to be reasonably priced. (paragraph 5)
Answer choices for the above question

If he wanted to move, then she was not averse to considering it. And the home had to be reasonably priced.

If he wanted to move, then she was not averse to considering it. The home had to be reasonably priced.

If he wanted to move, then she was not averse to considering it, but the home had to be reasonably priced.

If he wanted to move, then she was not averse to considering it. Therefore, the home had to be reasonably priced.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

If he wanted to move, then she was not averse to considering it. The home had to be reasonably priced.