Question

Question 5 A)The legal jurisdiction Western powers had in Chinese ports led to which of the following?(1 point) Responses Western powers had to pay taxes in China and follow Chinese laws. Western powers had to pay taxes in China and follow Chinese laws. Western powers had to pay taxes in China and they rebelled against the U.S. government. Western powers had to pay taxes in China and they rebelled against the U.S. government. Western powers did not pay taxes in China and they avoided Chinese laws. Western powers did not pay taxes in China and they avoided Chinese laws. Western powers did not pay taxes in China, but they had to stay out of China’s interior.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The correct answer is: Western powers did not pay taxes in China, but they had to stay out of China’s interior.

Answer 2

Question 6 A) Use the phrase to answer the question. “Substituting dollars for bullets.” How does President Taft’s dollar diplomacy phrase compare to President Roosevelt’s “big stick” diplomacy? (1 point) Responses Substituting dollars represented spending more money on military intervention to build on “big stick” diplomacy policies. Substituting dollars represented spending more money on military intervention to build on “big stick” diplomacy policies. Substituting dollars represented spending minimal money and resources to end conflict peacefully, whereas “big stick” diplomacy relied on military resources to end conflict. Substituting dollars represented spending minimal money and resources to end conflict peacefully, whereas “big stick” diplomacy relied on military resources to end conflict. Substituting dollars represented utilizing economic policy in exchange for the use of military threat, whereas “big stick” diplomacy relies on the threat of military force. Substituting dollars represented utilizing economic policy in exchange for the use of military threat, whereas “big stick” diplomacy relies on the threat of military force. Substituting dollars for bullets represented using military funds to build and expand U.S. economic interests in Latin America, whereas “big stick” diplomacy used military funds and resources. Substituting dollars for bullets represented using military funds to build and expand U.S. economic interests in Latin America, whereas “big stick” diplomacy used military funds and resources.

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

Substituting dollars represented utilizing economic policy in exchange for the use of military threat, whereas “big stick” diplomacy relies on the threat of military force.

Answer 4

Question 7 A)How were the tactics the British used to defeat the resistance movements of the Zulus and the Ashanti similar?(1 point) Responses The British were able to defeat the Ashanti because they allowed the Ashanti and Zulus to keep their leaders. The British were able to defeat the Ashanti because they allowed the Ashanti and Zulus to keep their leaders. The British were able to defeat both the Ashanti and Zulus in one crushing battle due to England’s military power. The British were able to defeat both the Ashanti and Zulus in one crushing battle due to England’s military power. The British enlisted the help of allies in Ethiopia, whose military strength helped them overpower the Ashanti and Zulu. The British enlisted the help of allies in Ethiopia, whose military strength helped them overpower the Ashanti and Zulu. The British were able to defeat both resistance movements because they exiled strong leaders and created divisions within the empires. The British were able to defeat both resistance movements because they exiled strong leaders and created divisions within the empires.

Answer 5

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The British were able to defeat both resistance movements because they exiled strong leaders and created divisions within the empires.