This question is also on the same source.

Do you think that this inquest led to improvements in the working conditions for climbing boys? Why or Why not?

Of course, I definitely think that improvements were made in the working conditions for climbing boys. I wouldn’t assume that the governments just ran away from this situation, and did nothing about it; all together they must have done something to support these children and make their work easier.

Your response is incredibly vague.

Of course, I definitely think that improvements were made in the working conditions for climbing boys.
Why "of course"?
What improvements have been made? Give lots of details.

I wouldn't assume that the governments just ran away from this situation, and did nothing about it; all together they must have done something to support these children and make their work easier.
Why would you not assume this?
"they must have done something" = ?? Such as ... what?

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/examples.htm
How and why you need to use details/examples to back up any statements you make.

http://aaweb.gallaudet.edu/CLAST/Tutorial_and_Instructional_Programs/English_Works/Writing/Essays.html
Whether you're writing a paragraph or an essay, these ideas are priceless.

http://leo.stcloudstate.edu/acadwrite/writeproc.html
Notice #3 on the list.

To determine whether the inquest led to improvements in the working conditions for climbing boys, you can follow these steps:

1. Consider the historical context: First, understand the setting in which the inquest took place. Consider the time period, prevailing societal attitudes, and the overall conditions for child labor during that era.

2. Research the findings of the inquest: Look for primary and secondary sources that discuss the outcomes of the inquest. This may include official reports, testimonies, or newspaper articles from the time. Analyze the specific recommendations or actions that were proposed as a result of the inquest.

3. Evaluate the responses and actions taken: Assess the actions taken by relevant governing bodies or organizations based on the inquest's findings. Look for evidence of changes in laws, regulations, or policies that specifically targeted the working conditions for climbing boys.

4. Investigate the historical record: Explore subsequent historical accounts to determine if there were any tangible improvements in the working conditions for climbing boys after the inquest. This might involve examining accounts from social reformers, labor movements, or sources detailing changes in child labor practices.

5. Consider the long-term impact: Reflect on the overall trajectory of child labor and the treatment of climbing boys in the years following the inquest. Evaluate whether any improvements, if they occurred, were sustained or led to broader changes in labor practices.

By following these steps, you can form a well-informed opinion on whether the inquest led to improvements in the working conditions for climbing boys. Remember to critically analyze the available information and consider multiple perspectives before drawing conclusions.