Question

In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, how did the Justices defend the armbands students wore in public school?

[] The armbands looked similar to the students’ uniforms.
[] The armbands were only worn by students for 30 minutes a day.
[] The armbands were small enough that no one could see them.
[] The armbands did not interfere with other students’ learning.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The Justices defended the armbands by arguing that they did not disrupt the educational process in any way and were a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution.