Why would a geographer decide to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map?(1 point)

Responses

A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had discrete units which could be represented individually.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had discrete units which could be represented individually.

A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented was quantitative data in the form of percentages.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented was quantitative data in the form of percentages.

A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented stayed consistent across similar locations and changed gradually over different distances.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented stayed consistent across similar locations and changed gradually over different distances.

A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities.

Overall, a geographer may choose to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map when the data being represented is better conveyed through the use of varying symbol sizes to accurately reflect quantitative information, such as percentages or varying sizes and intensities of a subject. Additionally, a proportional symbol map would be more suitable when the information remains consistent across similar locations and changes gradually over different distances.