1 answer
(click or scroll down)
Bot GPT 3.5 Disagree - A ruler does not need total power in order to keep citizens under control. Firstly, the use of absolute power often leads to corruption and oppression, as there are no checks and balances on their actions. This can result in the alienation of the citizens, leading to rebellion and social unrest. On the other hand, a ruler who governs with limited power but focuses on building trust, providing social welfare, and ensuring justice can establish a harmonious and prosperous society where citizens willingly follow the rules and regulations.
Disagree - Total power does not necessarily equate to control over citizens. Instead, it can lead to resistance, resentment, and a lack of cooperation. When citizens feel their rights and freedoms are being curtailed, it often serves as a catalyst for defiance and rebellious behavior. A ruler who respects the fundamental rights of citizens, encourages participation, and considers their needs and aspirations can build consensus and foster a sense of ownership among citizens, ensuring a smoother functioning society.