1 answer
(click or scroll down)
Compare the international reactions to the Rwandan genocide and the 9/11 attacks. Which of the following statements best describes how they compare?
The international reactions to the Rwandan genocide and the 9/11 attacks can be described as different in nature and scale. While both events shocked the world, the responses varied significantly due to the nature of the atrocities and the geopolitical context surrounding each incident.
1. The Rwandan Genocide: In 1994, the genocide in Rwanda resulted in the brutal killing of approximately 800,000 people, mainly from the Tutsi ethnic group. The international response to this tragedy was largely characterized by a lack of immediate action and minimal intervention. Many countries were hesitant to intervene due to political considerations, a lack of clear national interests, and the absence of a global consensus on how to address the crisis. The United Nations peacekeeping mission present in Rwanda at the time was ill-equipped and undermanned, and the international community, in general, failed to provide substantial aid or send a significant number of troops to prevent or stop the genocide. This lack of action has since been criticized, with many pointing to it as a failure of the international community to prevent mass atrocities.
2. The 9/11 Attacks: The September 11th attacks in 2001, orchestrated by the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, resulted in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people, mainly in the United States. The international response to this act of terrorism was marked by solidarity and a strong commitment to collective action. The global community, including traditional allies and international organizations, strongly condemned the attacks and swiftly offered assistance and support to the United States. NATO invoked Article 5, stating that an attack against one member was an attack against all, leading to military involvement in Afghanistan to combat the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The global response to 9/11 was characterized by an increased focus on counter-terrorism efforts, the formation of new international coalitions, and a reevaluation of global security measures.
In summary, the international reactions to the Rwandan genocide and the 9/11 attacks differed significantly. The response to the Rwandan genocide was marked by a lack of immediate action and intervention, while the 9/11 attacks prompted a strong and united global response against terrorism.