Question

In Levy v. Stoller, 2009 CanLII 31603 (ON SC), Justice Henderson refers in paragraph 43 to

a location between two properties that must follow a certain stipulated boundary line. In
order to better understand the issues in Levy v. Stoller, prepare a sketch that identifies
the kind of information you need in order to do what Justice Henderson has ordered. The
sketch need not be drawn to professional drafting standards; a simple hand-drawn sketch
scanned into an image will do. Explain your rationale – including referring to specific parts
of the judgment – that lead you to place the property line in the location you have drawn.
TASK 2 – [5 marks]
Earlier, in Tucker v. Moffatt, 2007 CanLII 57091 (ON SC), Justice Glithero also rendered a
decision involving competing claims to a disputed strip that were based on adverse possession.
However, his approach was one of needing to deal with a question of mistaken belief and, even
then, no one provided him with any kind of a legal description of the parcel that was in dispute.
Based on the decision reported at Tucker v. Moffatt, prepare a hand-drawn sketch to illustrate
the exact parcel that Justice Glithero requires in order to make a declaration about the relief
sought. As before, the sketch need not be drawn to professional standards; a simple hand�drawn sketch scanned into an image will do. Explain your rationale – including referring to
specific parts of the judgment – that lead you to place the property line in the location you have
drawn.
The cursive writing reads as follows:
Description – Being composed of part of Lot 32, Lake Range, Township of Saugeen –
Commencing at a point at High Water on Westerly limit of said Lot and distant 277’ in
a northerly direction from the Westerly angle of sd. Lot;
Thence easterly & ll (parallel) to southerly limit of sd. Lot 220 feet +/- (more or less) to
a fence;
Thence northerly ll (parallel) to easterly limit of sd Lot 150 ft. to a fence;
Thence Westerly parallel to southerly boundary of Lot 220 ft to H.W.M. (high water
mark) or Westerly limit of sd Lot;
Thence Southerly along H.W.M. 150’ +/- to place of beginning...”
Assuming this is all you uncovered and no further evidence is available before visiting the site

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

To prepare a sketch that identifies the kind of information needed in order to follow the stipulated boundary line in Levy v. Stoller, we would need the following information:

1. The starting point at High Water on the Westerly limit of the lot, which is 277 feet in a northerly direction from the Westerly angle of the lot.
2. The direction and distance of the first segment of the boundary line, which is parallel to the southerly limit of the lot and extends 220 feet (+/-) to a fence.
3. The direction and distance of the second segment of the boundary line, which is parallel to the easterly limit of the lot and extends 150 feet to a fence.
4. The direction and distance of the third segment of the boundary line, which is parallel to the southerly boundary of the lot and extends 220 feet to the High Water Mark (H.W.M.) or the Westerly limit of the lot.
5. The final segment of the boundary line, which follows the H.W.M. and extends approximately 150 feet (+/-) to the starting point.

Based on the provided description in the judgment, these are the key elements needed to accurately depict the stipulated boundary line. The sketch should demonstrate the relative positions and lengths of these segments, following the given directions and distances as described in the judgment.