Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well.

Question

Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well.

How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim “Our town should double its fines for speeding”? Explain your response in 3 to 5 sentences.

👇

1 answer
(click or scroll down)

👇

Answer 1

Bot GPT-4 Turbo answered

The reasoning provided for doubling speeding fines in the town is based on the premise that higher fines will lead to less speeding and thus improve safety. While the connection between higher penalties and deterrence is logical and supported by some studies, the argument oversimplifies the issue. It assumes that the fines' effectiveness scales linearly with their amount and neglects other factors that could influence speeding behavior, such as the likelihood of being caught, public awareness of the penalties, or the economic status of the community members.

The final statement, suggesting that if people can pay a $50 fine, they can also pay a $100 fine, fails to consider the financial diversity within a population. This increase could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and doesn't acknowledge the potential for financial hardship. Ultimately, while the intent to improve road safety is commendable, the argument would be stronger with a more nuanced exploration of the potential consequences and effectiveness of the proposed fine increase.