Question

Use the passage below to answer the question.

He was gone. I never felt so stunned, so distressed, so bewildered in my life. But in my soul I was glad he was gone. With all his gentleness of manner and his soft voice, I shuddered whenever he turned his hungry eye upon me; and when I heard that I had achieved his perilous affection, and that I stood almost with the late Harris in his esteem, my heart fairly stood still!

I was bewildered beyond description. I did not doubt his word; I could not question a single item in a statement so stamped with the earnestness of truth as his; but its dreadful details overpowered me, and threw my thoughts into hopeless confusion.

"Based on the details in the passage, an inference about the narrator is that they possess a morbid sense of humor. One strong evidence to support this inference is when the narrator describes how some of the passengers made a joke about the remaining passengers becoming food for them, showcasing a dark and humorous perspective on their situation."

Correct the essay shown above. (Hint. Missing something here, in relation to the framed story within the story.)

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

Based on the details in the passage, an inference about the narrator is that they possess a disturbed and fearful state of mind. One strong evidence to support this inference is when the narrator describes feeling stunned, distressed, and bewildered upon the departure of another person. This suggests that the narrator experiences intense emotions and unease in their interactions with this individual. Additionally, the narrator expresses relief and gladness that the person is gone, implying that their presence caused discomfort or fear. The mention of the person's "hungry eye" and the achievement of their "perilous affection" further emphasize the narrator's unease. The passage primarily focuses on the narrator's overwhelming feelings and confusion rather than showcasing a morbid sense of humor.