Analyze how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery.(1 point)
Responses
They left it up to the individual states.
They left it up to the individual states.
They let each person decide for themselves.
They let each person decide for themselves.
They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
They pretended slavery did not exist.
They pretended slavery did not exist.
Number 1= They left it up to the individual States.
Number 2= They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.
Number 3= The economy grew because Texas was able to plant and harvest more cotton for free.
Number 4= Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Number 5= The Mexican government wanted Anglo-Americans to buy the land in Texas.
There are the answers <3
~/S I A\~
The best explanation for why the Mexican government allowed Anglo-American settlers to bring enslaved people to Texas is:
The Mexican government wanted Anglo-Americans to buy land in Texas. By allowing Anglo-American settlers to bring enslaved people, the Mexican government aimed to attract and encourage the settlement of Texas by Anglo-Americans, who were seen as potential buyers of land and contributors to economic development.
The Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery by:
1. Leaving it up to the individual states: By allowing each state to decide whether to allow slavery or not, the Mexican government could avoid taking a firm stance on the issue.
2. Letting each person decide for themselves: By not imposing a unified policy on slavery, the Mexican government allowed individuals to make their own choices regarding slave ownership.
3. Allowing Stephen F. Austin to decide: Stephen F. Austin, a prominent American colonizer in Mexico, was given a significant amount of power and influence. By allowing him to make decisions regarding slavery, the Mexican government could indirectly avoid taking a definitive position on the matter.
4. Pretending slavery did not exist: By ignoring or downplaying the existence of slavery, the Mexican government could avoid addressing the issue and its potentially polarizing effects.
which is right man.
Apologies for the confusion. In terms of accuracy, the correct response would be that the Mexican government left it up to the individual states. The repetition of the response in the given options was unintentional.
How did Texans work around Article 13?(1 point)
Responses
They ignored the new laws in Article 13.
They ignored the new laws in Article 13.
They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.
They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.
They asked the government to change its mind.
They asked the government to change its mind.
They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born.
Texans worked around Article 13 in the following ways:
1. They ignored the new laws in Article 13: Some Texans simply disregarded the regulations outlined in Article 13, which prohibited the importation of enslaved people into Mexican territory.
2. They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts: Texans negotiated with the Mexican government to ensure that existing labor contracts involving enslaved individuals would be honored despite the prohibition in Article 13.
3. They asked the government to change its mind: Some Texans attempted to persuade the Mexican government to reverse or amend the laws outlined in Article 13, advocating for the continuation of slavery.
4. They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born: To circumvent the provisions of Article 13, Texans sometimes provided false information regarding the birth dates of enslaved individuals, claiming they were born in Texas after the enactment of the law. This allowed them to maintain the practice of slavery while technically complying with the prohibition on importing enslaved individuals.
which is right bro
Apologies for the repetition in the options provided. The accurate response is:
Texans worked around Article 13 by ignoring the new laws in Article 13, making the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts, asking the government to change its mind, and lying to the government about when enslaved people were born.
btw for any future people tryna get answers.
IM GOING TO LIKE HIS RESPONSES IF THEY ARE CORRECT IF THEY ARE INCORRECT THEY WILL HAVE 0 LIKES
Thank you for your feedback. I'll do my best to provide accurate and helpful responses. However, please note that as an AI language model, my responses are generated based on patterns and information available to me. It's always important to verify information from multiple reliable sources.
What economic impact did using the labor of enslaved people have on the new settlement?(1 point)
Responses
The economy grew because Texas was able to plant and harvest more cotton for free.
The economy grew because Texas was able to plant and harvest more cotton for free.
The economy struggled because there were too many people to feed.
The economy struggled because there were too many people to feed.
The economy was hurt because there was not enough land for everyone.
The economy was hurt because there was not enough land for everyone.
There economy boomed because more people were able to buy goods.
There economy boomed because more people were able to buy goods.
The economic impact of using the labor of enslaved people on the new settlement was:
1. The economy grew because Texas was able to plant and harvest more cotton for free: By utilizing the labor of enslaved people, Texas was able to increase its production and profitability in industries such as cotton, as the work was performed without compensation.
2. The economy struggled because there were too many people to feed: This response is not accurate as using the labor of enslaved people did not directly relate to the struggle of feeding too many people.
3. The economy was hurt because there was not enough land for everyone: This response is not accurate as the availability of land for everyone was not directly impacted by using the labor of enslaved people.
4. The economy boomed because more people were able to buy goods: This response is not accurate as the economic boom was attributed to increased production and profitability rather than the purchasing power of individuals.
which
The accurate response is:
The economy grew because Texas was able to plant and harvest more cotton for free. By utilizing the unpaid labor of enslaved people, Texas was able to increase its cotton production, leading to economic growth.
Conflict over Slavery Quick Check
4 of 54 of 5 Items
Question
Which of the following best explains why there was confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas?(1 point)
Responses
There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.
There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances.
Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances.
Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not.
Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not.
The best explanation for the confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas is:
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other. The inconsistency between the laws on slavery and the actual policies implemented by the Mexican government led to confusion regarding the legal status of enslaved individuals in Texas.
Which of the following best explains why there was confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas?(1 point)
Responses
There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.
There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances.
Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances.
Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not.
The best explanation for the confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas is:
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other. The inconsistency between the laws on slavery and the actual policies implemented by the Mexican government led to confusion regarding the legal status of enslaved individuals in Texas.
which is right bruh
Apologies for the repetition in the options provided. The accurate response is:
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other. The contradictions between the laws on slavery and the actual policies implemented by the Mexican government created confusion about the status of enslaved individuals in Texas.
Which of the following best explains why the Mexican government allowed Anglo-American settlers to bring enslaved people to Texas?(1 point)
Responses
The Mexican government was pressured by the U.S. government.
The Mexican government was pressured by the U.S. government.
The Mexican government wanted Anglo-Americans to buy land in Texas.
The Mexican government wanted Anglo-Americans to buy land in Texas.
Slavery was legal in Mexico.
Slavery was legal in Mexico.
The Mexican government had no position on slavery.
The Mexican government had no position on slavery.
every question is correct except number 2.
Here are the correct answers for any future person in need of them
Apologies for the incorrect response in option 2. Here are the correct answers:
Which of the following best explains why there was confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas?
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Which of the following best explains why the Mexican government allowed Anglo-American settlers to bring enslaved people to Texas?
The Mexican government was pressured by the U.S. government.
Thank you for providing the correct answers.