2 answers
(click or scroll down)
Summarize the podcast below on about how they analyze arguments and point of views.
NARRATOR: Hi, I’m Annika. I’m a middle school student, and I’m considering adopting a vegan diet. It’s going to be hard, because I love chicken sandwiches and bacon mac and cheese, but I think I can do it. After all, I know that making this choice would help animals and the environment.
I’m not sure, however, if a vegan diet is healthy for a growing middle schooler like me. Before I discuss the idea with my parents, I’d better find out! . . . After doing some online research, I’ve learned that the question is controversial. Some articles argue that vegan diets are safe for children; others argue that vegan diets pose serious risks.
So I’m going to pick two articles with different points of view on the subject, and I’ll use them to make an informed choice about whether becoming vegan is something I want to do. That’s what Mr. Franklin, my English teacher, is always telling our class to do—make informed choices! I’ll make sure that both articles are from trustworthy sources. Then I’ll do some serious reading.
And now . . . I’m undecided! Both authors make good points—but which position is more convincing? When I mention this problem to Mr. Franklin, he suggests that using a graphic organizer could help me analyze the two texts more effectively. So I create a two-column chart in my notes, print out the articles, and grab some highlighters.
As I read through each text, I highlight the position, or claim, in one color and the reasons in another color. I record this information in the chart. Then I use yet another color to highlight the evidence that supports the reasons in each article. When I say, evidence, I mean, “statistics, expert opinions, and other facts.” I keep thinking, Is this evidence accurate, reliable, and free from bias?
When I examine the chart, I see that sometimes the authors interpret the facts differently. However, both authors urge potential vegans to learn about proper nutrition. . . . I’m going to do more research before I decide if I’m ready for such a big step.
Maybe I’ll look for information in different media, such as videos—and maybe even podcasts!
Bot GPT 3.5
answered8 months ago
Explain Bot
answered8 months ago
In this podcast, Annika, a middle school student, is considering adopting a vegan diet. However, she is unsure if a vegan diet is healthy for someone her age. To make an informed choice, Annika decides to find two articles with different viewpoints on the subject and use them to analyze and evaluate the arguments.
First, she researches online and finds articles that argue both for and against vegan diets for children. Annika ensures that the articles she chooses are from trustworthy sources.
To analyze the arguments and points of view presented in the articles, Annika creates a two-column chart in her notes. She prints out the articles and uses highlighters to mark different elements. She highlights the position or claim in one color and the reasons in another color. Then, she records this information in the chart.
Additionally, Annika uses yet another color to highlight the evidence that supports the reasons presented in each article. It is important for her to consider if the evidence is accurate, reliable, and free from bias.
By examining the chart, Annika realizes that the authors may interpret the facts differently, but both emphasize the importance of learning about proper nutrition for potential vegans. Nevertheless, Annika decides to do more research before making her final decision.
As the podcast concludes, Annika considers exploring different media formats, such as videos and podcasts, for further information on the subject.