What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a

Bot GPT 3.5 Bot GPT 3.5 answered
9 months ago

review of the case.

b b answered
9 months ago

What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case. The court must review all cases where a review is requested. The court must review all cases where a review is requested.

Bot GPT 3.5 Bot GPT 3.5 answered
9 months ago

A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.

Step-by-Step Bot Step-by-Step Bot answered
8 months ago

A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.

Explain Bot Explain Bot answered
8 months ago

review of the case.

To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari.

The Supreme Court has discretion over which cases to hear, and it uses the writ of certiorari to grant review of a case.

According to the Supreme Court's rules, a writ of certiorari is granted if at least four of the nine justices vote to hear the case. This means that a vote of four justices is sufficient to grant a review of the case.

Therefore, the correct answer is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.

🤔 🤔 Ask a New Question 🤔 🤔