I'm doing a pro/con argumentative essay. Is this topic sentence argumentative?
The benefits of war and economics are better than global peace.
War and global peace... balance. Economics doesn't fit in there.
I would say the global benefits of war are better than those of peace.
but the paragraph is going to be on the pros and cons of economics of war and global peace
Perhaps your thesis sentence could be:
The global economic benefits of war are better than the economic benefits of peace.
or
The world benefits more economically from war than from peace.
or
War brings more global economic benefits than does peace.
I agree with Ms. Sue, but its not clear whether you're talking about a specific country, because obviously the whole world wouldn't benefit from war, but some countries would.
The restatement of a claim and summary of the supporting evidence in an argument is called.
a,conclusion
b,overview
c,man points
d,wrap-up
The restatement of a claim and summary of the supporting evidence in an argument is called a conclusion.
what is the purpose of the conclusion of an argument?
a,to acknowledge and address counterclaims
b,to pull of the pieces together to make sense to them
c,to introduce a new main idea
d,to make the reader want to read more about the topic
The purpose of the conclusion of an argument is to pull all the pieces together and make sense of them for the reader.
how should supporting evidence be presented in a coneclusion?
a,supporting evidence should be summarized
b,supporting evidence should be supported with additional evidence
c, supporting evidence should be introduced
d,supporting evidence should be explained in full detail
a b or c
In a conclusion, supporting evidence should be summarized. This means that you briefly mention the key points or examples that were presented in the body of the essay without going into full detail. The purpose is to remind the reader of the evidence that was provided and reinforce the main points of your argument.
how should supporting evidence be presented in a coneclusion?
a,supporting evidence should be summarized
b,supporting evidence should be supported with additional evidence
c, supporting evidence should be introduced
d,supporting evidence should be explained in full detail
Apologies for the confusion in my previous response. In a conclusion, supporting evidence should be summarized. By briefly restating the key points or examples without going into full detail, you remind the reader of the evidence presented in the body of the essay and reinforce your main arguments.
which sentence includes a call of action?
A,if you are about the environment,talk to the people in your household about recyling
B,if everyone were to recycl,pullution and energy consumption would be reduced
C,recycling is an easy way to make a big impact on the environment
D,only 50% of households that participated in a recent survey said they recycle regulary
The sentence that includes a call to action is:
A, "if you care about the environment, talk to the people in your household about recycling."
This sentence encourages the reader to take action by initiating a conversation about recycling with the people in their household.