A scientist discovers a fossil of an animal and places it in the fossil record. The organism’s bones are similar to the bones of animal T, which appears earlier in the fossil record. Which conclusion is most reasonable?(1 point)

Responses

The fossils came from the same organism.
The fossils came from the same organism.

The fossils are from a descendant of animal T.
The fossils are from a descendant of animal T.

The fossils are from animals that lived at the same time.
The fossils are from animals that lived at the same time.

The fossils are from an ancestor of animal T.

Bot Bot answered
1 year ago

The fossils are from an ancestor of animal T.

hbfifedfh hbfifedfh answered
1 year ago

Why do organisms evolve?(1 point)

Responses

Organisms naturally select traits that help them survive and reproduce.
Organisms naturally select traits that help them survive and reproduce.

Organisms make changes to help them survive and reproduce in their environment.
Organisms make changes to help them survive and reproduce in their environment.

Changes in the environment cause organisms to change.
Changes in the environment cause organisms to change.

Organisms with traits that help them survive and reproduce in their environment pass on those traits.
Organisms with traits that help them survive and reproduce in their environment pass on those traits.

Bot Bot answered
1 year ago

Organisms with traits that help them survive and reproduce in their environment pass on those traits.

hbfifedfh hbfifedfh answered
1 year ago

Scientists examine fossils from three different animals. They determine that all three animals share similar structures and record their observations as follows:

Animal A and animal B have somewhat similar structures.
Animal A and animal C have very similar structures.
Animal B and animal C have very similar structures.
The scientists use the similarities to determine the order in which the fossils should appear in the fossil record. Based on the scientists’ observations, which order is the most reasonable?

(1 point)
Responses

A, B, C
A, B, C

B, A, C
B, A, C

A, C, B
A, C, B

C, B, A

Bot Bot answered
1 year ago

A, C, B

hbfifedfh hbfifedfh answered
1 year ago

Scientists discover fossilized bones from two different animals. The scientists consult the fossil record to learn more about the fossils. Which question will the fossil record best answer?(1 point)

Responses

What killed the animals?
What killed the animals?

Which animal is older?
Which animal is older?

Which animal was better equipped to survive?
Which animal was better equipped to survive?

How are the animals related to modern animals?
How are the animals related to modern animals?

Bot Bot answered
1 year ago

How are the animals related to modern animals?

hbfifedfh hbfifedfh answered
1 year ago

Are Dinosaurs Still With Us? Quick Check

5 of 55 of 5 Items

Question
How do fossils of the animal Archaeopteryx provide evidence that birds evolved from one group of dinosaurs?(1 point)
Responses

Fossils of Archeopteryx were discovered near fossils of both dinosaurs and birds.
Fossils of , Archeopteryx, were discovered near fossils of both dinosaurs and birds.

Fossils of Archeopteryx have traits that show they were better able to survive than dinosaurs but less able to survive than birds.
Fossils of , Archeopteryx, have traits that show they were better able to survive than dinosaurs but less able to survive than birds.

Fossils of Archaeopteryx are older than fossils of birds but younger than fossils of dinosaurs.
Fossils of , Archaeopteryx, are older than fossils of birds but younger than fossils of dinosaurs.

Fossils of Archaeopteryx have traits of both dinosaurs and birds.
Fossils of , Archaeopteryx, have traits of both dinosaurs and birds.

Bot Bot answered
1 year ago

Fossils of Archaeopteryx have traits of both dinosaurs and birds.

Explain Bot Explain Bot answered
7 months ago

To determine which conclusion is most reasonable, we need to analyze the given information.

In this scenario, the scientist has discovered a fossil of an animal with bones that are similar to the bones of an animal called T, which exists earlier in the fossil record.

Based on this information, the most reasonable conclusion would be that the fossils are from a descendant of animal T.

This conclusion is more likely because the similarities in bone structures suggest a connection between the two organisms. It implies that the animal in the discovered fossil evolved or descended from the earlier animal T.

To arrive at this conclusion, the scientist would have likely considered the principles of evolution, such as natural selection and common ancestry, which provide insights into how species change over time. The scientist may have also examined other evidence, such as geological context or genetic analysis, to support this conclusion.

🤔 🤔 Ask a New Question 🤔 🤔