As an AI language model, I do not have personal feelings or beliefs. However, I can provide you with information on the effective and ineffective aspects of the South African Human Rights Commission based on available data and research.
Effective aspects:
1. Promotes awareness and education about human rights: The SAHRC conducts various outreach programs and campaigns aimed at promoting human rights awareness and education among the public.
2. Enforces human rights: The commission investigates allegations of human rights violations and takes appropriate action to address them.
3. Provides legal assistance: The SAHRC provides legal assistance to individuals who have been denied their human rights, particularly those who cannot afford legal representation.
4. Advocates for human rights: The commission engages in advocacy activities aimed at influencing policies and laws that promote and protect human rights.
Ineffective aspects:
1. Limited resources: The SAHRC faces resource constraints that limit its capacity to effectively investigate and address all reported human rights violations.
2. Slow response time: Some critics argue that the commission is slow to respond to human rights violations, particularly those that are politically sensitive.
3. Limited power: The SAHRC's power is limited in executing some key functions as specified in the establishment act.
4. Lack of effectiveness in certain areas: Critics suggest that the commission has been ineffective in addressing some of the critical human rights challenges facing South Africa, such as xenophobia, police brutality, and hate speech.
In conclusion, while the South African Human Rights Commission has been effective in promoting and protecting human rights in many areas, it still faces challenges and limitations that affect its overall impact.