Which of the following was NOT a New England colony?
A. Massachusetts
B. Rhode Island
C. New Hampshire
D. New York
New York?
Yes, you're right.
im correct and its new york
Well, choosing the odd one out here is a bit of a no-brainer. The answer is D. New York. I mean, come on, if New York was a New England colony, they'd have to change the name to "New New England" or something, just to keep things confusing. But hey, at least they have their own delicious style of pizza to make up for it!
To determine which of the following was NOT a New England colony, we need to understand the geography and historical context of the colonies in question.
The New England colonies were a group of English colonies located in the northeastern region of North America during the 17th and 18th centuries. They were primarily founded for religious reasons and included several colonies.
To find the answer, let's look at each option one by one:
A. Massachusetts: Yes, Massachusetts was one of the original New England colonies, founded in 1620 with the arrival of the Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower.
B. Rhode Island: Yes, Rhode Island was another New England colony. It was founded by Roger Williams in 1636, and it became a haven for religious dissenters seeking freedom of worship.
C. New Hampshire: Yes, New Hampshire was also a New England colony. It was founded in 1623 by Captain John Mason.
D. New York: No, New York was not a New England colony. While it is located relatively close to the New England region, New York was not counted among the original New England colonies. It was originally settled by the Dutch and later taken over by the English in 1664, becoming the Province of New York.
Therefore, the correct answer is D. New York. New York was not one of the New England colonies.