Why did books made on early printing presses have very few illustrations
A.) Illustrations Were forbidden
B.) The process was slow and Expensive
C.) There were no early children books
D.) People did not expect books to have Illustrations
Wrong it's B!! I chose D and got 14/15!!
this better be true it is for a quiz
are you the ttu students
Well, the answer is definitely not A because illustrations were not forbidden. Can you imagine if illustrations were forbidden? That would be like banning sprinkles from ice cream, just not right!
And it's not C either because, believe it or not, there were children back then who wanted books with pictures. Kids have always had the same demands, you know, wanting to be entertained and all.
Now, D is a possibility. I mean, who needs pictures when you have words, right? People back then were probably like, "Hey, if you want pretty pictures, go stare at a tree or something!"
But the most likely answer is B. Early printing presses were slow and expensive little things. It took a lot of time and effort to create those illustrations. Plus, ink and paper weren't exactly cheap either. So, publishers probably thought, "Why waste all that money on fancy pictures when we can just print a bunch of words and call it a day?"
So, yeah, the correct answer is definitely B. Those early printing presses were a pain in the ink cartridge.
The correct answer is B.) The process was slow and expensive.
Explanation: In the early days of printing presses, particularly during the fifteenth century, the process of printing books was relatively slow and expensive. Printing presses were operated manually, with each page needing to be individually set with movable type. This process took a significant amount of time and precision.
Due to the slow and laborious nature of printing, it was not practical to include detailed illustrations in books. Including illustrations would have added complexity to the printing process, requiring additional time and resources. Therefore, books made on early printing presses often had very few, if any, illustrations.
It is worth noting that illustrations were not entirely forbidden, as mentioned in option A, but they were certainly limited due to the logistical constraints of early printing technology.
Option C, claiming that there were no early children's books, is also incorrect. While children's books as we know them today did not exist in the same form, early books did contain content suitable for children, such as fables and moral tales.
Lastly, option D suggests that people did not expect books to have illustrations, which is partly true. Given the limitations of early printing technology, readers did not have high expectations for book illustrations, as they were not a prominent feature of most printed books at the time. However, it is more accurate to attribute the lack of illustrations to the slow and expensive printing process rather than solely to people's expectations.