19. How is Snyder v Phelps an example of competing rights? Be specific in your answer.

The court case of Snyder v phelps is an example of competing rights because the rights of privacy and speech are making distress and this came into conflict with the freedom of speech.

20. What is the difference between due process and protections in the fifth amendment and the fourteenth amendment how is that significant?

This is about how a dead soldiers father (Snyder) had to deal with protestors (Phelps) at his sons funeral. They had signs about how 9/11 was good.. that god hates s.. that America should be punished and thank god for dead soldiers... This is "protected" by the 1st amendment.. even though what was being said was wrong it was still a opinion on a social, political, or a popular subject, on public property and road.. so they cannot be punished for it. I understand why they were not punished but I wish they were. America should not protect those who are so clearly against it. They don't deserve it.

Yo mama not real

Thank you, and stay alive frens |-/

who hurt yall?

fr, no one cares lmao

Omg these replies ive never been so early to one

The difference between due process and protections in the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment lies in the scope and applicability of these rights.

The Fifth Amendment, which applies to the federal government, provides certain protections such as the right to due process of law, which ensures that individuals are treated fairly and have the opportunity to defend themselves in legal proceedings. It also protects against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and grants the right to just compensation for property taken by the government.

On the other hand, the Fourteenth Amendment, which applies to state and local governments, incorporates many of the fundamental rights provided by the Bill of Rights, including due process. In the context of the Fourteenth Amendment, due process includes both procedural due process, which ensures fair procedures in legal proceedings, and substantive due process, which protects fundamental rights that are considered to be deeply rooted in American history and traditions.

The significance of this difference is that while the Fifth Amendment applies directly to federal actions, the Fourteenth Amendment extends these protections to actions by state and local governments as well. This ensures that individuals' rights are protected at all levels of government and that states cannot infringe upon the fundamental liberties of their citizens without due process.

In summary, the Fifth Amendment provides protections against federal government actions, while the Fourteenth Amendment extends those protections to actions by state and local governments, ensuring broader and more comprehensive coverage of individual rights.

i hope you can experience the love of shutting the f up

I hope you can experience the love of God soon🤗🤍🤍

The 5th amendment demands that the U.S. guarantee those rights. The 14th applies the same guarantees to the states.