Which is not an argument in support of hate crimes legislation?
a. Hate crimes legislation sends a message that the United States does not support bigotry.
b. Hate crimes legislation ensures that perpetrators of these crimes receive serious punishment.
c. Hate crimes are meant to intimidate an entire population, rather than an individual.
d. Hate crimes are a personal, rather than symbolic act.
i don't have a clue..
I vote for d.
well thank you! (:
You're welcome.'
To determine which option is not an argument in support of hate crimes legislation, we need to analyze each option and identify whether it provides a valid rationale for supporting such legislation.
a. Hate crimes legislation sends a message that the United States does not support bigotry: This argument suggests that hate crimes legislation helps to communicate that the country stands against bigotry, which is a common reason for supporting this type of legislation.
b. Hate crimes legislation ensures that perpetrators of these crimes receive serious punishment: This argument emphasizes the importance of providing strong punishments for those who commit hate crimes, which is often seen as a justification for hate crimes legislation.
c. Hate crimes are meant to intimidate an entire population, rather than an individual: This argument highlights an essential aspect of hate crimes, explaining that their purpose is to intimidate and harm entire communities or populations rather than just an individual. This reason supports the need for hate crimes legislation.
d. Hate crimes are a personal, rather than symbolic act: This argument points out that hate crimes are personal acts of violence or intimidation, rather than acts with symbolic meaning. While this argument may be true, it does not directly support the case for hate crimes legislation.
Based on the analysis, option d is the one that is not an argument in support of hate crimes legislation. Therefore, the answer is d. Hate crimes are a personal, rather than symbolic act.