7. In the development of the Roman Empire, the Romans treated citizenship as
A. a benefit worthy only of peoples who had freely joined them.
[B. belonging only to native Romans.]
C. meaningless because the Roman Empire was tyrannical.
D. something to be shared with conquered people.
Nope.
http://www.dl.ket.org/latin1/mores/law/citizenship.htm
is it c
D. Something to be shared with conquered people.
zdwfe
Something to be shared with conquered people
To determine the correct answer, we need to analyze the information provided and understand the development of the Roman Empire's treatment of citizenship.
Option A suggests that citizenship was given only to peoples who had freely joined the Romans. However, this contradicts the historical reality, as citizenship was not limited to only those who willingly joined the Romans.
Option B states that citizenship belonged only to native Romans. This is a valid statement, as during the earlier stages of the Roman Empire, citizenship was primarily limited to native Romans. Roman citizenship was initially a privilege reserved for those who were born in Rome or the Roman Republic.
Option C suggests that citizenship was meaningless because the Roman Empire was tyrannical. However, this is a generalized statement and not specific to the treatment of citizenship in the Roman Empire.
Option D states that citizenship was something to be shared with conquered people. This option is also accurate. As the Roman Empire expanded through conquest, they gradually granted citizenship rights to individuals from the conquered territories. This policy of sharing citizenship with conquered people helped to assimilate them into Roman society.
Based on the historical context and information provided, the correct answer to the question is option B: belonging only to native Romans.