In which type of colony did strict governors anger the colonist?

A. the royal colonies
B. the proprietary colonies
C. the charter colonies
D. the informed colonies

royal colonies dude

To find the answer to this question, we need to understand the types of colonies and their governing systems. The correct answer is A. the royal colonies. Now, let's go through each option to better comprehend why strict governors angered the colonists in this particular type of colony:

A. The royal colonies: These colonies were under the direct control of the British crown. The governors in these colonies were appointed by the king or queen and often had a strict approach to governing. They implemented rules and policies without much input or representation from the colonists. This lack of participation and the feeling of being governed without consent frequently led to anger and frustration among the colonists.

B. The proprietary colonies: These colonies were owned and ruled by individuals or small groups who were granted permission by the king to establish and govern these colonies. While there were still governors in the proprietary colonies, they had more autonomy and authority than governors in royal colonies. Therefore, strict governors may not have been as prevalent in this type of colony.

C. The charter colonies: These colonies were granted a charter by the king, which outlined their basic rights and freedoms. Under the charter, the colonists had more control over their own governance, often having an elected governor rather than one appointed by the crown. Therefore, the chances of strict governors causing anger among the colonists in charter colonies were relatively low.

D. The informed colonies: This term does not exist in the context of colonial America and its governing system. Therefore, it is an incorrect option and can be eliminated.

In conclusion, the correct answer is A. the royal colonies, where strict governors, who were appointed by the British crown, often triggered anger among the colonists due to their authoritarian policies and lack of representation or consent from the colonists.