The supreme court under chief justice John Marshall was similar to the court under chief justice Earl Warren in that both

1) strengthened the power and influence of business

2) increased the president's war powers

3) changed public policy through broad interpretation of the constitution.

4) increased the rights of the accused under the fifth and sixth amendments

These articles may help you decide which is the right answer.

http://home.earthlink.net/~gfeldmeth/lec.marshall.html

http://articles.castelarhost.com/earl_warren_judicial_revolution.htm

To determine which of the options is correct, let's analyze each statement one by one and see if it applies to both the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall and Chief Justice Earl Warren.

1) Strengthened the power and influence of business:
- Under Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1835): The Supreme Court did issue some decisions that protected business interests and upheld the sanctity of contracts, such as in the case of Dartmouth College v. Woodward. However, Marshall was also concerned with maintaining a balance of power between the federal government and the states, which sometimes led to rulings that limited the power of businesses.
- Under Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953-1969): The Supreme Court under Warren was not known for specifically strengthening the power and influence of business. Rather, the Court focused on issues related to civil rights, individual liberties, and criminal justice.

Therefore, option 1 is not correct for both Chief Justices.

2) Increased the president's war powers:
- Under Chief Justice John Marshall: The Supreme Court did not play a significant role in issues related to the president's war powers during Marshall's tenure.
- Under Chief Justice Earl Warren: The Supreme Court, under Warren, did not significantly impact the president's war powers either.

Therefore, option 2 is not correct for both Chief Justices.

3) Changed public policy through broad interpretation of the Constitution:
- Under Chief Justice John Marshall: John Marshall's Court established the principle of judicial review in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison, which empowered the Court to interpret and guide public policy through the interpretation of the Constitution.
- Under Chief Justice Earl Warren: The Warren Court was known for its broad interpretation of the Constitution, particularly in cases involving civil rights, such as Brown v. Board of Education and Miranda v. Arizona. These interpretations did lead to significant changes in public policy.

Therefore, option 3 is correct for both Chief Justices.

4) Increased the rights of the accused under the fifth and sixth amendments:
- Under Chief Justice John Marshall: The Supreme Court, under John Marshall, did not specifically focus on expanding the rights of the accused under the fifth and sixth amendments.
- Under Chief Justice Earl Warren: The Supreme Court, under Warren, did play a significant role in expanding the rights of the accused. Examples include the incorporation of the exclusionary rule in Mapp v. Ohio and the requirement for the police to inform suspects of their rights (Miranda rights) in Miranda v. Arizona.

Therefore, option 4 is not correct for both Chief Justices.

In conclusion, the correct statement is:

3) Changed public policy through a broad interpretation of the Constitution.