I don't understand this question:
the removal of general mcclellan represents a loss of the army and the potomac and a victory for the interfering politicans in washington
(validate)
i know that mcclellan was replaced by grant because he was to hesitant to attack. but i don't understand this quesiton at all. i tried for an hour to try to understand it please help!
You're being asked to support the statement that McClellan's removal was a loss to the army and the Army of the Potomac. His removal was caused by the politicians. The implication is that a general in the field knew better how to fight a war than desk jockeys in Washington.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_B._McClellan
I understand that you're struggling to comprehend the given statement and seek validation or clarification for it. Let's break it down step by step:
1. "The removal of General McClellan represents a loss of the Army of the Potomac." This implies that General McClellan's removal had consequences for the Army of the Potomac, suggesting that his departure was seen as a setback for the army.
2. "And a victory for the interfering politicians in Washington." This indicates that the politicians in Washington who were involved in the decision to remove General McClellan perceived his removal as a triumph or achievement.
Now, to validate this statement, it would be helpful to analyze the historical context. General McClellan was indeed replaced by General Grant during the American Civil War. The reasoning behind his removal was largely attributed to McClellan being too cautious and hesitant to engage in decisive military action. This led to frustration among politicians and military leaders who wanted more aggressive tactics to be employed.
To validate the statement further, you could explore historical records, articles, or analyses that discuss General McClellan's removal and the subsequent impact on the Army of the Potomac. By delving into historical sources, you can gain a broader perspective and better understanding of the context surrounding General McClellan's removal and its perceived consequences.
I hope this explanation helps you in understanding the statement and provides guidance on how to validate it.