What are some physical concepts of being pro war (meaning I'm against global peace) besides economics & religion
Lots of dead and wounded soldiers.
What do YOU THINK?
So Far I have used being pro-war diminishes population, increases economic well being creates benefical technology advancements, and religion. I need two more physical concepts of being pro-war (and we are against global peace)
All those wounded troops will need lots of medical care, usually for the rest of their lives. Lots of jobs could be created to take care of all these issues -- doctors, nurses, physical therapists, etc.
I have that already under my economic advancements
Good God. How do you figure that war is an economic advantage. Much infrastructure is destroyed, sometimes entire countries...buildings, houses, bridges, schools, churches, orchards, farm livestock and so on. Both sides incur great amounts of debt which supported the war, and will have to repay that debt. In several notable instances in history, the debt has brought down countries.
Now your point on diminishing population. Geepers, so killing your family is a plus? What about jews? And blacks? Old people? This "postive" point of war is beyond me.
When considering physical concepts of being in favor of war or against global peace, it is important to understand that this topic can be subjective and opinions can vary widely. However, I can provide you with some general concepts that are sometimes associated with this perspective:
1. Security and defense: Some individuals may argue that being pro-war is necessary for national security and defense. They believe that preparing for war and maintaining a strong military presence can deter aggression from other nations and safeguard their own interests.
2. Geopolitics and strategic interests: Global power dynamics and competition for resources can motivate a pro-war stance. Some proponents may argue that engaging in conflicts is essential to secure access to valuable resources, geopolitical influence, or to counter potential threats from rival nations.
3. Nationalism and patriotism: People who prioritize national identity and loyalty may support the idea of war as a means to protect their country's values, culture, and interests. They may believe that military actions strengthen national unity and pride.
4. Humanitarian intervention: While this concept is controversial, some individuals argue that military intervention is necessary to protect human rights in situations where severe human rights abuses or genocide are taking place. They may believe that engaging in war is justified to prevent further suffering and restore peace.
5. Power projection and dominance: A pro-war position may be driven by the desire to exert influence and maintain global dominance. Proponents might argue that military force is necessary to protect the country's interests and maintain its standing on the world stage.
It is important to note that these concepts should be critically evaluated and weighed against the ideals of peace, human rights, and the potential consequences of war. It is also crucial to consider alternative approaches to resolving conflicts, embracing diplomacy, and promoting global cooperation.