Which of the following statements best explains why direct democracy worked in ancient Athens

1. The city-state's population of citizens was small.

2. Spartan women
3. Alexander the Great
4. balance and harmony of parts.
5. It was the center of trade for Europe, Africa, and Asia
6. Ephors could take kings out of power.
7. That a unified Greece could beat a larger army.
8. The Olympic Games were held to honor the God Zeus.
9. to teach moral lessons
10. Young boys were taught to obey orders.
11. The mountains isolated the city-states and The sea separated the city-states.
12. Athenian direct democracy allowed all free male citizens to make policy and American representative does not and American representative democracy allows citizens to elect leaders to shape laws and Athenian direct democracy did not.
13. Other nations saw Greece's lack of unification as weak.
14. The government consisted of an assembly, a council, and courts and Only free adult males made up the assembly and Women, slaves, and foreigners were not allowed to participate.
15. to get the resources they needed to survive
16. olive oil
17. to encourage doctors to use ethical practices
18. Sparta was conservative about change and the sharing of ideas while Athens accepted change and new opinions

AAAAAAAA is right!! the entire test was correct!! works for connexus, thank you!!!!

the answer is: The city-state's population of citizens was small

cool epic answer is right

To determine which statement best explains why direct democracy worked in ancient Athens, let's evaluate each option:

1. "Ancient Athenians were highly educated and well-informed about political matters."

This statement suggests that the success of direct democracy in Athens can be attributed to the high level of education and political awareness among its citizens. To determine if this is the best explanation, we should review historical evidence, such as the role of education and political participation in Athens, and how it impacted their decision-making process.

2. "The smaller population in ancient Athens allowed for more effective citizen participation."

This statement implies that the smaller population of Athens made it easier for citizens to actively participate in direct democracy, leading to its success. To determine if this is the best explanation, we can examine the size of the population in Athens compared to other ancient city-states and assess how it influenced the functioning of direct democracy.

3. "The institution of ostracism prevented the rise of tyrants and maintained political stability."

This statement suggests that the practice of ostracism, where citizens could vote to banish any individual deemed a threat to democracy for ten years, contributed to the effectiveness of direct democracy by ensuring stability and preventing the concentration of power. To assess if this is the best explanation, we can analyze historical records of ostracisms and their impact on governance and political stability.

By critically evaluating the historical evidence related to each statement, we can determine which one provides the most compelling explanation for why direct democracy worked in ancient Athens. It is essential to consider multiple perspectives and consult relevant historical sources to arrive at a well-supported conclusion.

According to all known laws

of aviation,

there is no way a bee
should be able to fly.

Its wings are too small to get
its fat little body off the ground.

The bee, of course, flies anyway

because bees don't care
what humans think is impossible.

Yellow, black. Yellow, black.
Yellow, black. Yellow, black.

Ooh, black and yellow!
Let's shake it up a little.

Barry! Breakfast is ready!

Coming!

Hang on a second.

Hello?

- Barry?
- Adam?

- Can you believe this is happening?
- I can't. I'll pick you up.

Looking sharp.

Use the stairs. Your father
paid good money for those.

Sorry. I'm excited.

Here's the graduate.
We're very proud of you, son.

A perfect report card, all B's.

Very proud.

Answer?????