Question 1
A) What happens when new evidence is found that contradicts part of a theory?(1 point)
The theory is discarded for a new one.
New pieces are added to the original ideas.
It gets ignored to maintain the original idea.
Science reevaluates the validity of the theory.
Question 2
A) How does a hypothesis differ from a scientific theory?(1 point)
Hypotheses can change with new evidence, but theories remain constant.
Theories always lead to the development of new scientific ideas.
Hypotheses are testable, while theories only exist conditionally.
Theories are well established with lots of evidence to support their claims.
Question 3
A) How is a hypothesis similar to theory?(1 point)
Both a hypothesis and a theory need evidence to support them.
Both a hypothesis and a theory are accepted as true statements.
Both a hypothesis and a theory are statements supported by data.
Both a hypothesis and a theory explain why things happen.
1 science reevaluates 2 theories are well 3 both need evidence to support them
thanks "wow"
Question 1: When new evidence is found that contradicts part of a theory, science reevaluates the validity of the theory.
Question 2: A hypothesis differs from a scientific theory in that hypotheses can change with new evidence, but theories remain constant.
Question 3: A hypothesis is similar to a theory in that both a hypothesis and a theory need evidence to support them.
Question 1:
When new evidence is found that contradicts part of a theory, science reevaluates the validity of the theory. This means that scientists take into account the new evidence and analyze how it affects the current understanding of the theory. If the new evidence is strong enough and contradicts a key aspect of the theory, it may lead to the theory being modified, adjusted, or even discarded and replaced with a new one. The goal is to ensure that scientific theories are based on the most accurate and up-to-date understanding of the natural world.
Question 2:
A hypothesis differs from a scientific theory in several ways. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a specific phenomenon or set of observations, while a scientific theory is a well-established and highly supported explanation that has been extensively tested and confirmed through repeated experiments and observations.
One key difference is that hypotheses can change with new evidence, but theories generally remain constant. Hypotheses are often formulated to test specific predictions or explanations, and as new evidence comes to light, they can be modified or even rejected altogether. On the other hand, theories have been rigorously tested and have withstood scrutiny over time, so they are considered well-established and supported by a significant body of evidence.
Question 3:
A hypothesis is similar to a theory in that both require evidence to support them. Both hypotheses and theories are statements or explanations that are formulated based on observations and data. In order to be considered valid, both hypotheses and theories need evidence to back them up.
However, it is important to note that while both hypotheses and theories explain why things happen, they differ in terms of their scope and level of support. Hypotheses are more specific and limited in scope, typically addressing a particular phenomenon or making predictions about a specific set of conditions. Theories, on the other hand, are broader explanations that have been extensively tested and supported with a significant amount of evidence. They are well-established scientific principles that explain a wide range of related phenomena and have stood the test of time.