1.Choose the method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source.

a.frame of reference
b.diverse perspectives
c.point of view
d.historical context

2.Explain the method a historian would use when they are thinking about an author’s feelings or action that favors one thing over another.

a.bias
b.point of view
c.frame of reference
d.historical context

3.Why is it important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis?

a.Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.
b.Primary sources are the only way to learn anything about the past.
c.Primary sources are created out of many different sources and thus provide the best information for researchers.
d.Primary sources make connections between different types of information, which can help researchers.

4.Which answer choice best explains how historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry?

a.Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources..
b.Historians must form their own bias when conducting research in order to form new questions..
c.Historians consult one or two sources in order to develop a research question.
d.Historians research questions that have already been answered.

5.Which statement best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history?

a.Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic.
b.A singular perspective is OK as people experience events in different ways.
c.Some views of an event or topic are more important than others.
d.It is harder to communicate clearly about a topic when multiple perspectives are included.

please help me i need to get a 100. =-=

1. d. historical context. Historians consider the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author in light of the historical context in which they lived, as this can significantly influence their source.

2. a. bias. Historians take into account an author's biases, which are their feelings or actions that favor one thing over another, when analyzing their work.

3. a. Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher. Using primary sources allows historians to access information directly from the people who experienced or witnessed the historical events, providing valuable insights and details that may not be available through secondary sources.

4. a. Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources. By critically analyzing sources, historians gain a better understanding of whose voices and perspectives are missing, leading to new questions and avenues of inquiry.

5. a. Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic. Considering multiple perspectives allows historians to uncover different viewpoints, biases, and motivations, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of historical events and developments.

1. The method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source is c. point of view. To analyze an author's point of view, historians would consider the author's specific beliefs, biases, and values that may have shaped their perspective in the source material.

2. The method a historian would use when thinking about an author's feelings or action that favors one thing over another is a. bias. Historians would examine an author's potential biases or preferences that could influence the content or presentation of their work and consider how this might impact the reliability and objectivity of the source.

3. The correct answer for why it is important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis is a. Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher. Primary sources are original documents or artifacts created during the time period being studied, offering direct evidence or eyewitness accounts of historical events. By using primary sources, historians gain access to the most immediate and unfiltered information about the past, which provides valuable insights and details for their research.

4. The answer choice that best explains how historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry is a. Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources. Through the analysis of sources, historians may identify gaps or biased perspectives in the existing historical narratives, prompting them to ask questions about the missing voices or alternative viewpoints. This encourages further investigation and the exploration of previously overlooked aspects of history.

5. The statement that best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history is a. Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic. By considering multiple perspectives, historians can gain a more comprehensive understanding of historical events, as different viewpoints provide different insights and interpretations. This allows for a more nuanced and well-rounded analysis of history, avoiding a one-sided or narrow understanding of the past.

1. The method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source is: c. point of view.

2. The method a historian would use when they are thinking about an author’s feelings or action that favors one thing over another is: a. bias.

3. The reason why it is important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis is: a. Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.

4. The best answer choice explaining how historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry is: a. Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources.

5. The statement that best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history is: a. Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic.

By answering these questions correctly, you should be able to achieve a high score! Good luck!