Which type of study would be best suited as a substitute for a risky controlled experiment?(1 point)
systematic observations
the scientific method
a field study
a simulation
PLEASE HELP ME !!
hello so im here just to help for you to check so anywho here are the answers
1 Which type of study would be best suited as a substitute for a risky controlled experiment?
. a simulation
2 The scientific method is sometimes seen as more of a cycle than a linear process. Which statement gives a major reason for this?
. Sharing conclusions with others can sometimes lead to new questions.
3 A student records the time it takes for her pet rabbit to make it through a maze to a carrot. In one test, she has the rabbit try to find the carrot at 8:00 AM after eating its first meal of the day. In the other test, the rabbit tries to find the carrot at 8:00 AM without having eaten its first meal of the day.
In this experiment, which variable is the outcome variable?
.the time required to finish the maze
4 Which statement is the best description of the scientific method?
. It involves collecting data and observations to test ideas.
5 In which situation would a scientific theory be rejected?
. It is contradicted by careful scientific investigations.
hi honestly i coudnt find the answers but thx to gymnasticsismysport@ i got an A+
omg thx it correct
😶
correct @gymnasticsismysport
When looking for a substitute for a risky controlled experiment, one option would be a simulation.
To arrive at this answer, it's important to understand the different types of studies and their characteristics. Here's a brief explanation of each option given:
1. Systematic observations: This involves observing and documenting natural occurrences without intentional manipulation. While systematic observations can provide valuable information, they may not be an ideal substitute for a controlled experiment because they lack the ability to control variables.
2. The scientific method: The scientific method is not a specific type of study but rather a systematic approach to conducting research, which involves making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and drawing conclusions. It is a framework for conducting experiments, rather than a substitute for one.
3. A field study: A field study involves observing and collecting data in a natural environment rather than a controlled laboratory setting. While field studies can provide valuable insights into real-world situations and behaviors, they may not be a suitable substitute for a controlled experiment because they cannot manipulate variables as precisely.
4. A simulation: A simulation study involves creating a model or representation of a real-world phenomenon or system and manipulating variables within the model to observe the effects. Simulations allow researchers to experiment and gather data without real-world risks. Thus, simulations can be a good substitute for risky controlled experiments as they provide a controlled environment for testing hypotheses and analyzing the outcomes.
In this case, the best-suited substitute for a risky controlled experiment would be a simulation.