Which statement accurately compares the environmental impact of underground mining and hydraulic fracturing?
Both can cause sinkholes.
Both can impact marine wildlife.
Both can cause earthquakes.
Both involve digging deep into the earth.
Extraction and processing of fossil fuels quick check.
Earth science B. Unit 6 Lesson 2
1.) which environment impact is caused by both refining oil and refining natural gas?
A. Sinkholes
B. Air pollution ✔️
C. Marine habitat destruction
D. Landslides
2.) Which statement accurately compares environmental impact of underground mining and hydraulic fracturing?
A. Both involve digging deep into the earth✔️
B. Both can cause earthquakes
C. Both can cause sinkholes
D. Both can impact marine wildlife
3.) which of the following is the cleanest burning fossil fuel?
A. Carbon
B. Natural gas ✔️
C. Crude oil
D. Coal
I believe it is D, Both involve digging deep into the earth.
Ur mom:) is correct 3/3
It is D. "Both involve digging deep into the earth." Hope this helps
Correct 🥰
which environment impact is caused by both refining oil and refining natural gas?
Air pollution
Which statement accurately compares environmental impact of underground mining and hydraulic fracturing?
Both involve digging deep into the earth
Which of the following is the cleanest burning fossil fuel?
Natrual gas
1. Air pollution
2. Both involve digging deep into the earth
3. Natural gas
100% credit goes to ur mom
PLz help
Yes, that is correct. Great job!
To accurately compare the environmental impact of underground mining and hydraulic fracturing, we can analyze each statement individually:
1. Both can cause sinkholes: Underground mining involves excavating materials from beneath the Earth's surface. Depending on the stability of the surrounding rock formations, mining activities can potentially weaken the structure, leading to the formation of sinkholes. On the other hand, hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, involves injecting high-pressure fluids into rocks deep underground to extract oil or natural gas. While fracking itself is not directly associated with sinkhole formation, improper handling of wastewater or the disposal of fracking fluids can potentially lead to sinkhole development.
2. Both can impact marine wildlife: Underground mining typically does not impact marine wildlife directly, as it involves mining operations that primarily take place underground on land. However, mining waste and runoff can contain pollutants that may find their way into water bodies, potentially affecting marine ecosystems indirectly. In contrast, hydraulic fracturing, without proper safeguards in place, can pose risks to aquatic environments due to potential groundwater contamination and the release of fracking fluids into water sources.
3. Both can cause earthquakes: Underground mining can induce seismic activity known as induced seismicity, particularly when removing large volumes of rock or extracting minerals through methods like longwall mining. This can result in minor to moderate earthquakes. Similarly, hydraulic fracturing has been associated with induced seismicity in certain cases, primarily due to the injection of fluids into the rock formations, which can increase the geological stress and potentially trigger seismic events.
4. Both involve digging deep into the earth: Both underground mining and hydraulic fracturing involve going deeper into the Earth's surface. Underground mining involves excavating underground tunnels and shafts to access mineral resources. Hydraulic fracturing, as mentioned earlier, requires drilling deep wells into the subsurface to access oil or natural gas deposits trapped within rock formations.
Considering the statements provided, the most accurate comparison between the environmental impacts of these two processes is that both can cause earthquakes. While other similarities exist, such as digging deep into the earth, the impact on sinkholes and marine wildlife can be different depending on the specific circumstances and environmental practices employed.