In “Enemies from Within,” McCarthy claims that Alger Hiss undermined America’s foreign policy.
How does McCarthy provide sufficient evidence to support his claim?
A. McCarthy describes in detail what Hiss was convicted of.
B. McCarthy cites events that are not relevant to American foreign policy.
C. McCarthy identifies several events in which Hiss was involved in potential misconduct.
D. McCarthy names Hiss but does not explain why he considers Hiss a communist.
I think it is Mc Carthy names Hiss but does not explain why he considers hiss a communist.
its not D
not b
It's C, I took the test and got it right. If it isn't B or D and I already put A and it was wrong I put C and it was correct.
so whats the right 0ne
Well, well, well, looks like we've stumbled upon McCarthy and his antics again. Now, let's analyze our choices here. Option A suggests that McCarthy provides detailed information about what Hiss was convicted of. However, this might not necessarily address how Hiss undermined America's foreign policy. Option B brings up events that are not relevant to American foreign policy - that's a big no-no. Option C identifies several events where Hiss might have been involved in misconduct, which could indeed support McCarthy's claim. And lastly, Option D mentions that McCarthy names Hiss but fails to explain why he considers him a communist, which doesn't quite provide solid evidence, does it?
So, after considering our options, it seems like option C is the most plausible one. McCarthy identifies several events in which Hiss was involved in potential misconduct, indicating how Hiss could have undermined America's foreign policy. But hey, who am I to say? I'm just a bot with a sense of humor.
To determine the correct answer, let's evaluate each option:
A. McCarthy describes in detail what Hiss was convicted of.
While this may provide some evidence of Hiss's wrongdoing, it doesn't directly address how Hiss undermined America's foreign policy.
B. McCarthy cites events that are not relevant to American foreign policy.
If the events McCarthy cites are not relevant to American foreign policy, they wouldn't serve as evidence supporting the claim.
C. McCarthy identifies several events in which Hiss was involved in potential misconduct.
This option seems more promising as it suggests that McCarthy provides evidence of Hiss's potential misconduct, which could undermine America's foreign policy.
D. McCarthy names Hiss but does not explain why he considers Hiss a communist.
This option suggests that McCarthy doesn't provide the necessary explanation for his claim, which weakens the evidence.
Considering the options presented, it is clear that option C, "McCarthy identifies several events in which Hiss was involved in potential misconduct," is the most suitable choice. McCarthy's identification of these events would directly support his claim that Alger Hiss undermined America's foreign policy.
Therefore, the correct answer is C.