Read the summary.
The earliest humans originated in northern Europe (1) and traveled south via land bridges to Asia and Africa (2). As people spread throughout the world, a shift from hunter-gather to farming occurred (3), which led to increased food production, laws, culture, and disease (4).
Which option critiques the factual accuracy of the summary?
While parts (1) and (2) are accurate, parts (3) and (4) need revision.While parts (1) and (2) are accurate, parts (3) and (4) need revision. , ,
While parts (3) and (4) are accurate, parts (1) and (2) need revision.While parts (3) and (4) are accurate, parts (1) and (2) need revision. , ,
While part (1) is accurate, parts (2), (3), and (4) need revision.While part (1) is accurate, parts (2), (3), and (4) need revision. , ,
While parts (1), (2), and (4) are accurate, part (3) needs revision.While parts (1), (2), and (4) are accurate, part (3) needs revision. , ,
Option 2 critiques the factual accuracy of the summary. It states that parts (3) and (4) need revision, while parts (1) and (2) are accurate.
To critique the factual accuracy of the summary, we need to evaluate each statement.
1. The earliest humans originated in northern Europe and traveled south via land bridges to Asia and Africa. - This statement is accurate.
2. As people spread throughout the world, a shift from hunter-gather to farming occurred. - This statement is accurate.
3. The shift to farming led to increased food production, laws, culture, and disease. - This statement is accurate.
4. Given that all the previous statements are accurate, there is no need for revision in part (4).
So, the correct option is: While part (1) is accurate, parts (2), (3), and (4) need revision.