OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM:

"A rectangular field is to be enclosed on four sides with a fence. Fencing costs $7 per foot for two opposite sides, and $5 per foot for the other two sides. Find the dimensions of the field of area 620ft^2 that would be the cheapest to enclose".

Thank you in advance!

let each of the expensive sides by x ft, and each of the other two sides be y ft

xy = 620
y = 620/x

cost = 7(2x) + 5(2y)
= 14x + 10(620/x)
d(cost)/dx = 14 - 6200/x^2 = 0 for a min of cost
14 = 6200/x^2
x^2 = 3100/7
x = √(3100/7) = ...
carry on

If the dimensions are x and y, then

xy = 620
The perimeter is
p(x,y) = 2(x+y)
and the cost is thus c(x,y) = 2(7x+5y) = 14x + 10y
But, using y from above,
c(x) = 14x + 10(620/x) = 14x + 6200/x
Now minimize the cost by finding where dc/dx = 0

I forgot to include the answer choices:

A. 39 ft @ $7 by 17.8 ft @ $5
B. 21 ft @ $7 by 29.5 ft @ $5
C. 29.5 ft @ $7 by 21 ft @ $5
D. 17.8 ft @ $7 by 34.9 ft @ $5

c = 7(2x) + 5(2y) = 14 x + 10 y

620 = x y
so
y = 620/x

c = 14 x + 6200/x
dc/dx = 14 - 6200/x^2 which is zero for min c
14 x^2 = 6200
x^2 = 442,86
x = 21 at $7
then y = 620/21 = 29.5 at $5

Why did the rectangular field go to therapy? Because it had too many dimensions to fence!

Now, let's solve this optimization problem step by step.

Let's assume the length of the field is 'x' feet and the width is 'y' feet.

The cost of the two opposite sides would be $7 per foot, so the total cost of these two sides would be 2xy * $7 = 14xy dollars.

The cost of the other two sides would be $5 per foot, so the total cost of these two sides would be 2(620/y) * $5 = 1240/y dollars.

Now we need to express the total cost as a function of one variable. Let's choose 'y'.

The total cost C(y) = 14xy + 1240/y.

To find the minimum cost, we need to find the derivative of C(y) with respect to y and set it equal to zero.

C'(y) = 14x - 1240/y^2 = 0.

Solving this equation, we find y^2 = 1240/(14x).

Now, we know that the area of the field is xy = 620.

Substituting this value into the equation, we get y^2 = 1240/(14(620/x)) = 1240x/8680 = 0.1428x.

So, y = sqrt(0.1428x).

Now, substitute this value of y into the equation for the total cost C(y) and simplify it.

C(x) = 14x(sqrt(0.1428x)) + 1240/(sqrt(0.1428x)).

To minimize C(x), we need to find the derivative of C(x) with respect to x and set it equal to zero.

Now, solving this equation would involve some tedious calculations and we wouldn't want to bore you with that! But once you find the value of x at which the derivative is zero, substitute it back into the equation for y.

And voila! You'll have the dimensions of the field that would be the cheapest to enclose. Happy optimizing!

To find the dimensions of the rectangular field that would be the cheapest to enclose, we need to minimize the cost of the fencing.

Let's start by representing the dimensions of the field. Suppose the length of the field is L feet and the width is W feet. We are given that the area of the field is 620ft^2, so we have the equation L * W = 620.

Now, let's consider the cost of the fencing. For the two opposite sides, the cost is $7 per foot, so the total cost for these sides is 2 * L * $7 = 14L dollars. Similarly, for the other two sides, the cost is $5 per foot, so the total cost for these sides is 2 * W * $5 = 10W dollars.

The total cost, C, of enclosing the field would be the sum of the costs for the two opposite sides and the other two sides:
C = 14L + 10W

We want to minimize this cost, subject to the constraint L * W = 620.

To find the dimensions of the field that minimize the cost, we can use the method of partial derivatives. We differentiate the cost function C with respect to each variable, set the partial derivatives equal to zero, and solve the resulting system of equations.

Taking the partial derivative of C with respect to L, we get:
dC/dL = 14

Taking the partial derivative of C with respect to W, we get:
dC/dW = 10

Setting both partial derivatives equal to zero, we have:
14 = 0 and 10 = 0.

These equations have no solution, which means there are no critical points for the cost function C. However, since we are dealing with a rectangular field, we have a constraint equation L * W = 620.

To find the dimensions that minimize the cost, we can solve the constraint equation for one variable and substitute it into the cost function.

Solving L * W = 620 for L, we have:
L = 620 / W

Substituting this expression for L in the cost function C, we get:
C = 14(620/W) + 10W

Now, we can minimize this function by finding its critical points. Taking the derivative of C with respect to W, we get:
dC/dW = -869600/W^2 + 10

Setting dC/dW equal to zero and solving for W, we have:
-869600/W^2 + 10 = 0

Rearranging this equation, we get:
869600/W^2 = 10

Solving for W, we find:
W = √(869600/10) = 93.36 feet

Substituting this value for W back into the constraint equation, we have:
L = 620 / W = 620 / 93.36 ≈ 6.63 feet

Therefore, to enclose an area of 620ft^2 with the cheapest cost, the dimensions of the field should be approximately 6.63 feet by 93.36 feet.