Which of the following would be an exception to the right to peacefully assemble?

A. A group of union members goes on strike against the public utility compare
B. A politician interest group holds a meeting in a private home
C. A group of Nazis march to of mostly Jewish neighborhood * my awnser
D. A group of people protesting increased fees blocked the entrance to a bank

Yes, c.

does anyone have the answers

@BeingMe it's not that there's nothing wrong, it's just that it isn't illegal. Nazis marching through a Jewish Neighborhood with the knowledge that it is Jewish is seriously messed up, but not strictly illegal.

C. A group of Nazis march to a mostly Jewish neighborhood

Well, that's definitely an exception. We wouldn't want any neighborhood "Nazi parades" ruining everyone's day. We all know clowns are much more entertaining than Nazis anyway.

To determine the exception to the right to peacefully assemble, we need to understand the concept of the right to peacefully assemble and analyze each option provided.

The right to peacefully assemble is a fundamental right enshrined in many democratic societies, including the United States. It grants individuals the freedom to gather and express their opinions, often in the form of public protests or demonstrations. However, this right is not absolute, and there are certain exceptions.

Let's analyze each option:

A. A group of union members goes on strike against the public utility company.
This situation does not constitute an exception to the right to peacefully assemble. Going on strike is a form of peaceful assembly and is legally protected as a way for workers to express their grievances collectively.

B. A politician interest group holds a meeting in a private home.
This also does not represent an exception to the right to peacefully assemble. While the setting might be in a private home, it still constitutes a peaceful gathering of individuals with a common interest, and they have the right to assemble and discuss their concerns.

C. A group of Nazis marches through a predominantly Jewish neighborhood.
This option does qualify as an exception to the right to peacefully assemble. The right to peacefully assemble does not protect hate speech or activities that incite violence or provoke hatred towards a particular group. Therefore, a demonstration by a group known for promoting hate and targeting a specific community would likely be considered an exception to the right to peacefully assemble.

D. A group of people protesting increased fees block the entrance to a bank.
This option does not necessarily indicate an exception to the right to peacefully assemble. However, if the protest escalates into violence or becomes disruptive to the point of interfering with others' rights, such as blocking entrances, it may no longer be considered a peaceful assembly.

In conclusion, option C - a group of Nazis marching through a predominantly Jewish neighborhood - would be an exception to the right to peacefully assemble since it promotes hate and targets a particular group.

D. A group of people protesting increased fees blocked the entrance to a bank

There is nothing wrong with Nazi's marching through a Jewish neighborhood. As long as they are causing no harm there is no problem.