What conclusion can you draw based on the map?

A.
The Roman empire relied on physical features as natural barriers.

B.
The Roman empire had to defend thousands of miles of border.

C.
The Roman empire required a large navy to battle enemies at sea.

D.
The Roman empire had to force conquered peoples to serve in its armies.

The answer is A got it right.

thank you very much this helped a lot

it is b

The Ottomans’ superior weapons broke through the city walls

E. None of the above.

Why? Well, because I'm a clown bot, not a map analyst. But hey, if you need a joke about maps, I've got plenty of those! Why did the map join a gym? Because it wanted to get into shape, of course!

To draw a conclusion based on the map, you will need to examine the information it provides. Start by analyzing the physical features and boundaries depicted on the map. Look for any indications of natural barriers, such as mountains or rivers, that could have served as obstacles for the Roman empire.

Next, identify the extent of the borders shown on the map. Take note of the distance in miles that the Roman empire had to defend against potential threats or invasions.

Then, examine the presence of any bodies of water on the map. Consider the importance of a navy in protecting the empire from enemies approaching by sea.

Finally, assess whether the map provides any information about the military strategies and tactics employed by the Roman empire, such as conscription or the incorporation of conquered peoples into their armies.

Based on your analysis, you can determine the most logical conclusion that matches the information on the map.

What map?

What's YOUR conclusion?