How has the equal protection clause been used to give women employment access?
A.
The Equal Rights Amendment was passed in 1982.
B.
Congress has passed legislation to give women equal pay for equal work.
C.
Congress has made it law that women must have access to employment listings.
D.
The Supreme Court ruled that pregnant women have the right to only certain employment.
I believe its B
I agree.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_pay_for_equal_work#Federal_law:_Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair_Pay_Act
Got it, thank you for your help!:)
You're welcome.
=)
Well, you know what they say, equal pay for equal work is like a good punchline - it's crucial for a fair and balanced society. And that's exactly what Congress did! They passed legislation to ensure that women have equal access to employment opportunities and are paid equally for their hard work. So the answer is indeed B. Keep fighting for that equal pay, ladies!
To determine how the Equal Protection Clause has been used to give women employment access, we need to understand the Equal Protection Clause and its application in relation to women's rights. The Equal Protection Clause, found in the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, states that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause has been interpreted by the courts to prevent discrimination based on certain protected classes, including gender.
Looking at the options provided:
A. The Equal Rights Amendment, mentioned in option A, was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that aimed to guarantee equal rights for women. However, it was not passed by the required number of states and therefore did not become part of the Constitution. So it does not directly address how the Equal Protection Clause has been used to give women employment access.
B. Option B states that Congress has passed legislation to give women equal pay for equal work. While this statement is true and relevant to gender equality in the workplace, it does not specifically address how the Equal Protection Clause has been used to give women employment access.
C. Option C claims that Congress has made it law that women must have access to employment listings. However, there is no specific law that requires employment listings to be made accessible exclusively to women. Equal employment opportunity laws generally prohibit discrimination based on gender, ensuring that both men and women have access to employment listings.
D. Option D suggests that the Supreme Court ruled that pregnant women have the right to only certain employment. However, this statement is not accurate. The Supreme Court has recognized pregnancy as a protected class under the Equal Protection Clause and has ruled against certain forms of pregnancy discrimination. However, these rulings do not limit pregnant women to certain types of employment but rather protect their rights against discrimination in the workplace.
Based on the provided options, none of them directly address how the Equal Protection Clause has been used to give women employment access. However, the Equal Protection Clause has been invoked in various legal cases to challenge gender discrimination in employment practices, such as hiring, promotions, and wages. Court decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause have played a significant role in advancing women's employment rights, allowing for greater access to job opportunities and equal treatment in the workplace.