Use the excerpt below from the English Bill of Rights to answer the following question:
"That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law..."
Public Domain
How did the English Bill of Rights represent a change from the existing political trends in 17thÚSdm4á| century Europe? (5 points)
It limited royal power and made Parliament more powerful.
Most other governments didn't codify and publish laws.
It was issued by the king of England to limit his own power.
It mentioned government authority regarding religion.
What is meant by the term illWhat is mWhat is meant by the term illegal alieneant by the term illegal alienegal alieWhat is meant by the term illegal alien
n
To answer this question, we need to analyze the provided excerpt from the English Bill of Rights and understand its implications in relation to the existing political trends in 17th century Europe.
The excerpt mentions several key points that represent a shift in the balance of power between the monarchy and Parliament:
1. "That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal" - This statement asserts that the King's power to suspend or disregard laws without Parliament's consent is unlawful. This challenges the traditional view of royal supremacy and establishes the principle that the monarch's authority is limited by the consent of Parliament.
2. "That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal" - This indicates that the King's power to exempt individuals or groups from the law without Parliamentary approval is also deemed illegal. Again, it restricts the royal authority by requiring the involvement of Parliament in matters of law.
3. "That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal" - This passage highlights the restriction placed on the King's ability to raise funds without the explicit approval of Parliament. It aims to prevent arbitrary taxation and reinforces the principle that financial matters must be subjected to Parliamentary oversight.
4. "That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal" - This guarantees the right of citizens to petition the King without fear of punishment or persecution. It emphasizes the importance of individual rights and limits the ability of the monarchy to suppress dissent.
5. "That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law" - This clause ensures that the establishment and maintenance of a standing army during peacetime requires the approval of Parliament. It curtails the power of the monarch to mobilize military forces without the democratic representation and consent of the people.
Considering these points, the English Bill of Rights represents a significant departure from the prevailing political trends in 17th century Europe. It limited royal power by subjecting it to the authority and consent of Parliament. This shift towards constitutional monarchy and the recognition of individual rights had implications beyond England and influenced subsequent political developments in Europe and around the world.
Therefore, the correct answer is: It limited royal power and made Parliament more powerful.